In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Rechtsstreit zwischen dem Geheimrat und Lizenten Johann Wilhelm Wiederholdt zu Wetzlar und Henrich Löhr zu Burbach nebst Konsorten wegen des Erwerbs des von Trümbachischen Gutes zu Burbach
Rechtsstreit zwischen dem Geheimrat und Lizenten Johann Wilhelm Wiederholdt zu Wetzlar und Henrich Löhr zu Burbach nebst Konsorten wegen des Erwerbs des von Trümbachischen Gutes zu Burbach
Fürstentum Siegen, Landesarchiv - Akten 36 X Nr. 9
E 601 Freier Grund Sel- und Burbach
Freier Grund Sel- und Burbach >> 2. Sayn-Hachenburgische Regierung >> 2.3. Adel, adlige Güter und Adelsprozesse
(1722, 1727, 1729) 1736
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält u.a.: Prozessunterlagen (Supplik, Zitation des Reichskammergerichts); Korrespondenzen zwischen dem Fürsten Christian zu Nasau-Dillenburg und den Grafen Georg Friedrich von Kirchberg wegen der intendierten Niederlassung des Geheimrats Wiederholt in Burbach und dessen Ankauf des von Trümbachischen Gutes; Korrespondenzen zwischen dem Oberschultheißen Bauermeister zu Neunkirchen und der Regierungskanzlei zu Hachenburg wegen des geplanten Ankaufs des von Trümbachischen Gutes zu Burbach durch den Geheimrat Wiederholt zu Wetzlar; Protestationen des Georg Weber als Trümbachischer Tochtermann gegen den Verkauf des adeligen Hauses zu Burbach; Abschriften von Erklärungen und Suppliken des Johann Wilhelm von Trümbach von 1722 und 1727 betreffend den Verkauf des Gutes Burbach; Supplik der von Trümbachischen Erben zu Burbach wegen eines Streits mit der Witwe des gräflich-lippischen Capitains von Trümbach von 1729.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.