In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Zentralarchiv für deutsche und internationale Kunstmarktforschung
Record
A002_IV_060
A002 Galerie Zwirner
Galerie Zwirner
1989
Die Akte setzt die Galeriekorrespondez des Jahres 1989 mit den Buchstaben B bid J fort. Neben Angeboten, Verkäufen, Leihgaben, Speditionsunterlagen, Zertifikaten und Provinienzanfragen befinden sich in der Akte auch Rechtsangelegenheiten mit unterschiedlichen Galerien: Fortsetzung des Rechtsstreits mit dem Kunsthandel Bernd Göbel, Baden-Baden, auf Grund einer Otto Freundlich Skulptur; Briefwechsel zwischen Thomas Cohn, Rudolf Zwirner und der Art Cologne zu Vorschriften des Zulassungsausschusses; Korrespondenz zwischen Fahnemann und Zwirner zu einer geplanten Grafik-Edition; Korrespondenz mit der Barbara Gladstone Gallery, New York; Fautrier Ekta.
Enthaltene Galerien:
Galerie Brusberg, Berlin; Leo Castelli Gallery; New York; Thomas Cohn, Arte Contemporanea, Rio de Janeiro; Cooke Fine Art, New York; Jeffrey Deitch, Art Advisory Service, New York; Galerie Delta Rotterdam; Galeria di Meo, Paris; Galleria l'Attio, Rom; Galerie Dürr, München; Stephane Dykman, Art Consultant, Paris; Exelsior Proposte d'Arte, Asiago; Ernesto + Krips Galerie, Köln; Galerie Fahnemann, Berlin; Nationalgalerie Berlin; Chriatian Fayt, Art Gallery, Knokke; Richard L. Feigen Gallery, New York; Galerie Mathias Fels & Cie, Paris; Barbara Gladstone Gallery, New York; Galerie Konrad Fischer, Düsseldorf; Galerie 1900-2000, Paris; Galerie Eric Franck, Genf; Heiner Friedrich, New York; Jablonka Galerie, Köln; Christian Fürstenberg, Freiburg; Gemini S. A., Genf; Galerie Daniel Gervis, Paris; Glabman Ring Gallery, Los Angeles; Marian Goodman Gallery; New York; Galerie Grässlin Ehrhardt, Frankfurt; Richard Grey Gallery, Chicago; Nigel Greenwood Gallery, London; Galerie Michael Neumann; Burnett Miller Gallery; Hirschl & Adler Modern, New York; Galerie Michael Haas, Berlin; Galerie Susanne Zander, Berlin; Konstantin von Haeften, Frankfurt; Fres Hoffmann Gallery, Santa Monica; Rhona Hoffmann Gallery, Chicago; Bud Holland Inc., Cicago; Zabriskie Gallery, New York; VivianHoran Fine Art, New York; Didier Imbert Fine Art, Paris; Galerie Fabien Boulakia, Paris; Galerie Fred Jahn, München; Sidny Janis, Ltd., New York; Galerie Jöllenbeck, Köln.
Weitere:
Etablissements Edition Festival, Schaan; Centr Georges Pompidou, Paris; Christie's Deutschland, Düsseldorf; Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam; Museum of Modern Art of Stockholm; Kunsthaus Zürich; Museum of Modern Art, Tokyo; Catherine Duret, Genf; Museum Ludwig, Köln; Siegfried Loch, Hamburg; Villa Grisebach Auktionen, Berlin; Museum of Modern Art, New York; Arno Kohnen; Pater Mennecke, Köln.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.