In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Maximilian Hundt von Lautterbach auf Schambach und seine Ehefrau Maria Isabella, geb. von Ehrenbach, verkaufen die Hofmark Paitzkofen im Landgericht Natternberg an Christoph Dürnizl, Ältester Bürgermeister zu Straubing. S1=A1. S2=A2
Maximilian Hundt von Lautterbach auf Schambach und seine Ehefrau Maria Isabella, geb. von Ehrenbach, verkaufen die Hofmark Paitzkofen im Landgericht Natternberg an Christoph Dürnizl, Ältester Bürgermeister zu Straubing. S1=A1. S2=A2
Kloster St. Emmeram Regensburg Urkunden, BayHStA, Kloster St. Emmeram Regensburg Urkunden 4108
KU Regensburg-St. Emmeram F. 280
Registratursignatur/AZ: Kasten 6, Schublade Nr. 24, Nr. 1
Kloster St. Emmeram Regensburg Urkunden
Kloster St. Emmeram Regensburg Urkunden >> V. 1601-1800
1646 Juni 22
Kloster St. Emmeram Regensburg Urkunden
Perg.
Urkunden
ger
Besiegelung/Beglaubigung: zwei an Pergamentpressel anhängende Wachssiegel in Holzkapsel
Überlieferung: Ausf.
Sprache: dt.
Ausstellungsort: Straubing
Originaldatierung: So geschehen zu Straubing den zwen und zwainzigisten monatstag junii...im sechzehenhundert sechs und vierzigisten jare.
Medium: A = Analoges Archivalie
Jahr: 1646
Monat: 6
Tag: 22
Äußere Beschreibung: 20 x 34,5 cm
Hundt von Lautterbach: Maximilian, zu Schambach auf Paitzkofen und Parkstetten (Stetten)
Hundt von Lautterbach: Maria Isabella, geb. von Ehrenbach, Ehefrau des Maximilian, zu Schambach
Dürnizl: Christoph, Ältester Bürgermeister zu Straubing
Straubing (krfr.St.): Bürgermeister
Paitzkofen (Gde. Straßkirchen, Lkr. Straubing-Bogen), Hofmark des Reichsstifts St. Emmeram
Natternberg (Lkr. Deggendorf), Pfleggericht
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.