In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Strafsache gegen 1. Johan Dirickman aufgrund Erschießung in Notwehr?; 2. seine Begleitung Johan Deiterman
Enthält: Strafsache gegen 1. Johan Dirickman in Nienberge, Sohn des Bitter Uphaus, Gografen zur Meest, 2. Johan Deiterman in Nienberge, auch Dieters genannt. Der Angeklagte Dirckmann hat auf dem Wege von Münster nach Nienberge den Soldaten Nettelwilm aus Nienborg erschossen; bei ihm war der andere Angeklagte. Er wendet Notwehr ein, er sei von dem Erschossenen beleidigt und bedroht und sei zunächst nach Reidegelts Kotten an der Pfaffenstiege geflohen. Zunächst entsteht ein Zuständigkeitsstreit zwischen Rat und dem Gografen zur Meest. Der Rat behauptet seine Zuständigkeit und entlässt die Angeklagten nicht aus der Haft. Als Zeugen werden vernommen 1. Johan von Havernbeck, Barbierer in Horstmar, 30 J. alt; 2. Henrich Üding in Horstmar, 32 J. alt; 3. Katharina Albering, Magd des Schulten Kalthoff in Nienberge, 21 J. alt; 4. Katharina, Frau Henrich Wideman, 26 J. alt, 5. Johan Engelberting, Bäcker des Domkapitels, aus Nienberge gebürtig, 44 J. alt. Dr. med. Bernard Rottendorff und mehrere Barbierer erstatten Gutachten. Erwähnt werden Herman Kestering und Notar Henrich Brincius in Schöppingen; Anton Hobing; Engelberg Koning; Melchior Hollinck; Erasmus Letmate; Henrich Buschmann, Rotger Kreienborg, Hans Broske; Notar Stephan Buschman; Kaspar Eickrodt, Gograf zu Telgte; Katharina Alberting, Frau des Angeklagten Dirckmann, Anna Deitering, Schwester des Angeklagten Deiterman; Johan zu Eikell; Notar Herman Conerding: Bernard und Johan Hannasch, Johan Scheper; Martin Ketteler; der Notar Johan Groning und Johan Rulle; die Barbierer Herman Hölscher senior und junior, Gerhard von Vorden und Melchior Rokelose; Bartold Kellinghausen; Weinschenk Wilbrand Stael; Henrich Kock; Bernard Stücker; Johan Kaldenberg, Barbierer in Horstmar.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
CC0 1.0 Universal