In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Prozess des Grafen Sebastian von Hatzfeld zu Wildenburg gegen die Fürsten Wilhelm Hyacinth und Friedrich Wilhelm Adolph zu Nassau-Siegen vor dem Reichskammergericht in puncto amicabilis compositionis et recognitionis documentorum
Prozess des Grafen Sebastian von Hatzfeld zu Wildenburg gegen die Fürsten Wilhelm Hyacinth und Friedrich Wilhelm Adolph zu Nassau-Siegen vor dem Reichskammergericht in puncto amicabilis compositionis et recognitionis documentorum
Fürstentum Siegen, Landesarchiv - Akten >> 19. Angelegenheiten des Adels >> 19.4. Familie von Hatzfeld
1713-1731
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält u.a.: Prozessunterlagen (Abschriften von Suppliken, kaiserlichen Reskripten, Kommissionsprotokolle, Notariatsinstrumente); Extrakt aus Hübners Genealogie betreffend die Grafen von Hatzfeld (1716); Beilegung des Rechtsstreits zwischen den Grafen zu Hatzfeld und den Fürsten zu Nassau-Siegen wegen offener Schulden durch eine kaiserliche Kommission unter Leitung von Kurmainz und Sachsen-Gotha; Mandatum procuratorium der Grafen Franz und Lothar Franz zu Hatzfeld für den Anwalt Dr. Philipp Jacob Khistler und den Reichshofratsagenten Johann Nasal (01.06.1720); Abschriften von nassauischen Familienverträgen aus den Jahren 1472, 1504 und 1516; Abschrift einer Obligation des Grafen Johann VI. zu Nassau-Siegen vom 17.03.1606 über 6000 Rädergulden für Sebastian von Hatzfeld; Protokollauszug in der Reichskammergerichtssache von Pollmann wider Ostfriesland (1730); Verzeichnis der Vorgänge im Streitfall von Hatzfeld wider Nassau-Siegen von 1654-1730. Korrespondenten u.a.: Franz Wilderich von Menßhengen, Geheimrat Johann Friedrich Freiherr Bachoff von Echt, Kanzler J. W. Wincop (Mainz), Dr. Philipp Jacob Khistler, Reichshofrat Caspar Römer, Franz von Heffener, Peter Friedrich von Klerff.
177 Bl.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.