In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Relationen des Obergerichts >> 01. Gesamte Archivalien
1720
Jürgen Brauer contra Obrist von Bornfels in pto debiti. - Concurssachen von Steffen Maaßen. - Friedrich Walter und Jacob Dettloff contra das Amt der Schneider in pto violentia et injuriarum. - Christoffer Rohr contra Jürgen und Conrad Müller in pto debiti. - Matthias Krüger und David Suffert, Hutmachergesellen contra die Meister Albrecht und Hinrich Heinke in pto injuriarum. - David Draguhn und Jürgen Brauer contra Johann Crull und Johann Lehmann in pto Beschrittene Amtsbeliebung. - Joachim Hartwig Prignitz contra Christian Brandt in pto nachträgliche Überfallung. - Niclas Möller contra Christoffer Hecht in pto vidicationis. - Joachim Johan Schliemanns Witwe contra den Candidatum Tanck in pto des Eggebrechtschen Gasthauses. - Margaretha Goldstecd contra Henrici Tanck in pto variorum. - Jeremias Kahlenberg contra die Brauer Compagnie in pto Eingriffs. - Peter Burmester contra Claus Senkspiel in pto injuriarum. - Concurs und Liquidationssachen des Johann Lüsche. - Bernd Ohbahn contra das Wismarer Gewett in pto ungehorsam. - Concurs und Liquidationssachen von Hinrich Oldenburgs Witwe und Erben. - Concurs und Liquidationssachen von Joachim Christoffer Crohn. - Die Brauer Compagnie contra die Witwe von Johann Schütte. - Die Alterleute und Meister des Schusteramts contra Peter Zorn in pto betriebene Böhnhaferey. - Jürgen Juhl und Johann Schütts Witwe contra Christian Adam Müller in pto debiti. - Der Oeconom Joachim Gröning contra Claus Maschmaus Witwe in pto debiti. - Concurs und Liquidationssachen von Frantz Lindevolts Erben. - Willichs contra Frantz Lindevolts Erben in pto debiti. - Jacon von Gebern contra Joachim Rode in pto väterlichen Ausspruchs. - Hinrich Lübke contra das Wismarer Gewett in pto nicht recht erlegter Accise. - Das Amt der Altflicker contra das Schusteramt in pto Eingriffs. - Caspar Lembke contra Joachim Schütt in pto debiti. - Die Witwe von Johan Heinrich Schusterbach contra Gabriel Lembke in pto amesti. - Christian Holst contra Philipp Christoffer Schultz in pto injuriarum. - Concurssache von Claus Marckmaus Witwe. - Margarethe Goldstedt contra Henrici Tanck in pto variorum. - Jürgen Gärner contra CatharinaHeinsch in pto trariactionis. - Johann Burmeister contra Claus Senkspiel in pto injuriarum. - Landrat von Sperling contra Ehefrau des Kammerjunkers N N Negendank auf Zierow, geborene von Perckenthin in pto Auseinandersetzung um die Peckatelsche Kapelle in St. Marien. - Joachim Hartwig Prignitz contra Christian Brandt, Müllerbursche in pto Auseinandersetzung um einen nächtlichen Überfall und Hausgewalt. - Christian Schröder contra Vormünder der Kinder von Hans Jürgen Eckert in pto Auseinandersetzung um die Bezahlung von Schulden. - Älterleute und Meister des Schusteramts contra Peter Zorn in pto Auseinandersetzung um Böhnhaserei
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International